sendloha.blogg.se

• Compressor 4 setup for a 3.4 ghz intel core i7 windows#

Compressor 4 setup for a 3.4 ghz intel core i7 windows#

I see you are on windows and process management is more difficult there. That means that task switching is dot done properly, that something is waiting for input or whatever I suspect that these performance issues are out of the users hands as I have tried everything I can think of.Īctually they way i look at it, it is actually the clue : your processors are near idling, while Mixbus does not get the time to deal with its jobs., Setting the program priority doesn't seem to change performance much, if at all. (05-03-2016, 06:25 AM)Frank Wrote: It gives me the feeling that Mixbus is running at a too low priority, and does not get back in time to deal with their buffers and high and low watermarks. Someone has been able to get Doom running on an Amiga 1200, surely the people at Harrison should be able to get Mixbus running smoothly on a quad core (in case) or a 12 core i7 (in my case). If so then I think there is some real optimization to be done in Mixbus. I have downloaded Reaper now and will try the exact same setups in reaper to see if there is a significant difference in performance some time in the next couple of days. I suspect that these performance issues are out of the users hands as I have tried everything I can think of. Increasing buffers help a lot, but when working with softsynths thats not really an option. Nothing outside of mixbus indicates that the system is struggling at all, but mixbus passes out completely. I am having similar problems on my 12 core 32GB system. (05-03-2016, 06:25 AM)Frank Wrote: (05-03-2016, 05:39 AM)Overmann Wrote: It would be nice if Mixbus was able to use more system resources. I think we have to look into process control, thread control changes the nice values Guitar bass in GuitarRig, keys midi in to Kontakt grand piano/ Rhodes and 4 string sections. Effectively the whole band played on my laptop. Not so long a go, on similar or same hardware quad core I7 i ran a vst host : 4 instances : each with 8 to 12 soft synths. My experience is quite similar, but well, i need to get more cores and DRAM was my conclusion. It gives me the feeling that Mixbus is running at a too low priority, and does not get back in time to deal with their buffers and high and low watermarks.Īnd the time slice the soft synths have is too long. Looks like you have ample resources ( make me very jealous ). Increasing buffers help a lot, but when working with softsynths thats not really an option.įor mixing you can set the buffers as high as possible.

(05-03-2016, 05:39 AM)Overmann Wrote: It would be nice if Mixbus was able to use more system resources.